Quote:
Originally Posted by fireandice  Wow....with just that one statement you just knocked the female back more than a century. We are capable of doing more than just nurturing. I think that a female can run a country. I've seen plenty of females run a tight fist on a house hold with five childern, work and help out with money matters along side the husban. We bring things to the table that are different, like how we may look at something is quite different then how a male may look at it. Though, Hilary wouldn't be my choice, if the right female was running for office I would vote for her. |
I agree. I don't care what a man says or what even a woman says about a woman shouldn't be president or whatever. What the hell do they know? Absolutely nothing? If you don't think that a woman shouldn't be president, what proof do you have? I have said this before in another thread: If England France Pakistan can have woman leaders why can't we? I'm so sick and tired of woman selling themselves short. Would you rather have it like it was in the 50's where women were oppressed and had no freedoms? Well do you? Would rather work over a hot stove and have to ask the "man of the house" for everything? Having them have say what you do with your own body? Well would you?
I don't know about you but I don't. I think women are far more capable than men at ruling a nation because we are nurturers. Being a nurturer isn't a bad thing really. With women we can actually negotiate with other countries and come to peaceful terms. Unlike with what Bush is doing. Woman aren't likely to ask Congress (let alone start themselves) to start a war. So really being a nurturer isn't a flaw. It's something that you can shape into your greatest strength. Not keep it as a weakness.