Ads are not the issue. Splitting content with ads is. (ie. shoving ads between every 3 or 4 posts in a thread).
Gamefaqs absolutely does NOT.
Behold:
GameFAQs - Adult Swim Comedy Message Board
They did once and EVERYONE and their MOTHER complained. It was an experiment that ended in flames 8 hours after it began.
No one begrudges a site for having advertisements. But having those advertisements appear in the middle of the site content (and a majority of them for sketchy bs no one wants to click or buy anyway as opposed to ads targetting this actual usergroup with something they may be vaguely interested in), is another.
Pop-ups, split threads, plants, false "articles", phishy links, adware: these are annoying forms of advertisements.
Banners are a reality of life when sites are sold to people who want to make money.
Anyone who thinks IGN, Gamefaqs, MiniTokyo, etc are "supporting their site" through ads is an idiot. Those ads generate REVENUE for the site owners. And generally speaking, the site owners get shit if they try to generate revenue in a way that's annoying to their users.
That... or people leave.
There's NOTHING on this site currently that people can't easily get elsewhere.
Maybe that's the ultimate difference.
There isn't anything that sets AO apart that would make me want to tolerate threads split with advertisements.
I think it's idiotic. But if you guys want to make the site obnoxious for everyone who isn't using firefox: hooray. Don't pretend you love the ads and aren't just turning them off with your adblocker.
If I didn't give a crap about this site I certainly wouldn't be complaining about something that apparently shouldn't even affect me. I'd go start a thread about how to turn the ads off as a mod and that would be the end of it. The point is: this bothers me, as a member. And when this happened on Gamefaqs, everyone got up and left. When advertisements doubled on rotten tomatoes, I got ticked and left (so did a lot of other people). I suppose at this point, after having spent years in fandoms and on boards: I don't appreciate the notion that we're supposed to give our time, effort and money to coorporations and private individuals to profit off of and then being told that that money "supports the site" or that the site somehow "needs the change". Rupert MURDOCH bought Rotten Tomatoes. He's a freaking billionaire! PLEASE don't lecture me about how he needs me to click his banners so that his children don't starve ~_~;
I understand the reality of the internet.
But you need to understand the reality of user-generated content.
When contributors are not appreciated, rewarded, exploited, or even punished (with fees, lack of access, limitations, intrusive/deceptive advertisement, etc): they leave.
And so does your content.
This isn't about ME. It's about EVERY image, review and snippet of information on this site which was donated by a member without any payment in return. THOSE are our donations to the site. To ask us to turn around and pay for it, THEN to make a move to try and annoy us into doing it (on the same day the payment was introduced): that's lame.
[/url]