Quote:
Originally Posted by tsurara  For all your extensive knowledge of world history, you've failed to give a single example of a primarily exclusive homosexual society at all... much less the established fact that all homosexual societies decline.
Who's being dense? |
You are.
I have given you the full explanation as defined by HISTORIANS. You seem to think it requires an exclusively homosexual society to meet the standard when that IS NOT WHAT I SAID! I said (over and over again) it requires a society with a weak traditional family unit, that does not value families with a father, mother, and child that lasts, but does find societal behavior such as exclusive homosexual relationships (individual not society on a whole) as desirable. It is not that hard to find and it has been well documented. It is one of several signs of a weak society that will be unable to defend itself from internal or external stress or a natural disaster. It is the difference between a society handling what comes or falling apart.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsurara All you've done is insist that the word homosexuality does not refer to homosexual behavior |
No I said that a society that requires them to marry and have children is defined as a BISEXUAL SOCIETY by HISTORIANS and always has been. We are discussing a historical setting so we use
historical definitions not psychoanalytical ones.
Now if you want to find out if your society fits the mold just go around and ask the teenagers how many of them want to be married and have children then compare it to the number that think having a child out of wedlock, divorce, or homosexuality is perfectly normal and should be treated as such. Then ask them how many love watching people get killed in shows or love watching people be eliminated in reality shows. Then ask them if doing drugs or binge drinking is alright or not. That will give you the answer right there whether or not where ever you live is historically considered rip to fall.