| Re: Lowering Military Standards- Fair or Unfair?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrianna  If those standards are for combat readiness reasons they should absolutely not be lowered and from what I have read they were based on just that. I have no problem with lower standard for support services as long as those services never go anywhere near the lines (as Len mentioned even supply caravans can be hit). However, in reverse I think that if a woman, one of "those rare gems" can meet the higher standards that men do there is no reason they shouldn't be allowed the same combat opportunities. Any chance we can get them all together in the same unit? Let the jihadist beware! We have m4l> 4m42()n5 on our side! | well that is true but it is also true that in the way of genetics (no offence to any females) that men do have a better stamina and things like that. So it is true that women should not have to do more.
It is also true that the "standerds" of the human today is very... poor...
It might be usefull to "lower the bar" as some might say but it is also true that some people should work harder than others to be prepared for war.
__________________
?namuh a namuh ekam tahw
Last edited by basilisk888; Mar 13, 2008 at 04:41 PM.
|