Thread: Uniting the world..

Problem with a board of leaders, is that it doesn't work well either.

We have boards of leaders in countries to restrict the main leader, and we have group meetings to discuss many things inside the world itself. If that hasn't done much, it isn't because of the world really... it's because of them.

A group would hold much more power than an individual... and that can be horrifying...
If a single group acts as one and are more effective than one, they can do much to help the world... but there can be a great many things hidden behind their doors that doesn't seem very... kosher.

A group can hide secrets better than an individual...

...and what catastrophe would exist if this group suddenly split?

that would be inpossible for the reason of religion and what would a democrayc or something else and there would still be wars either way north korea would still think they were top dog and so would china it would fall apart before it began

most of you say that it wouldnt work..thats because the premise or ONE leader is just too advanced for humansa as a whole. we havent reached the point yet mentally where we can respect others equally that are of different reace, religion, ect.

the best bet would be to go with a United Nations-esque form of international cooperation. where EVERY nation would have a propurtinate say in matters to their population. and there shouldnt be restrictions, and instead incentives, to join.

A person could just as easily leave the United Nations.... and they wouldn't be afraid to do so either.

The so-called "United Nations" wouldn't be strongly bonded in the same ideal to even perform a plan of action. The most they can do is restrict each other in actions, and make opinions of what should be done... if a vote is casted and won, who knows if it's even the right choice? I know it'd still be their fault, but it wouldn't be too different from the world today.

im not saying the UN is perfect, in fact they suck. our UN is basically the USA's idea of controling everyone else...but like i said, we are not ready yet for a unified nation. a treaty orginization or allaiance is better for what he have going on now.

>-<...Well Ray what you say now *one president for the entire world* …..

Ok did you ask yourself who will be the best one?
From where this person * which country *? Everyone will fight to have this inductor …* much war *...
How he \she control the entire world?

And other many Questions … I do not think it will be good idea for the world.This thing will make the world like * popcorn in the oil *and the wars becomes more .you see now every country have a president for the same country and still fighting so why we put more wood for the fire …

Hmm... that is true..things can go like that... @.@ surely it is needed that the world to be more united than it is ever has...so things like that can be avoided..