Twitchy

HaHa back at you! Prove it that your statement is true

__________________

thanks shonen

Miroku4444

Hes the creater of all, I just don't believe everything in the bible. That don't mean i dont believe he exists.

__________________

kedar

I wish not to embarrass anyone on the boards. So, if you really wish to see it all, come to The Land of Monks, and my fellow monk and I will enlighten you with grace. Haha.

Oh, which statement are we talking about?

__________________

preston drake

i think that the idea that we evolved from monkeys and apes is not true. thought the fact that we have evolved is true. we evolved at the same time as the monkeys and apes meaning that this is the reason they have nnot also evolved. this also means that we all evolved at the same time from animals that were similar but since we all lived in different places we evolved differently. therefore this is why we are so different from monkeys.

Zdenek

Although Darwin had very few clues compared to current scientists, he got the principle right. More and more DNA analyses prove that what he suggested is true. Firstly, there is a common predecessor to monkeys and humans, but it's now extinct and this makes for a slightly larger distance from the monkeys. The DNA of the monkeys and us was found to be very similar and many genes responsible for the specific differences were found. They are mostly defects on the original monkeys' properties that freed the room for our new ones, the most prominent being the reduction of the chewing muscle to allow for larger skull without breaking it; the body hairs underwent the same knockout.
God as presented by the church is utter nonsense. If one exists, he is on a higher position and doesn't need to create any organisms. In fact, if he existed, he would have to be totally ignorant to everything, because he would be a mere spectator.
Maybe he uses us as a screensaver.

__________________

Dejiko | Koboshi | Puchiko | Misha

Soshi Kitai

1st off... similar. We can say a lot of things are similar, they may be just one....... er........ or was it two........ thingies away from us, but that only supports the theory, it doesn't PROVE it.

I'm not saying there's no way it can be right, I'm just stating that for the first part.


2nd... of course God would have NO NEED AT ALL TO CREATE US AS AN EXISTANCE.
God does not NEED anything, He IS EVERYTHING and NOTHING.

However, whoever said we made everything for what we needed?
Then people question whether or not God is so selfish that we are just there for His amusement.

But both of the statements are false.

In one explanation, they say that God's glory is so great, that it overflowed... henceforth the "creation" of us.

But that seems a little iffy, doesn't it? ^_^ Well, it's reasonable if you think about it hard enough.

However, you could say that God DOES have a plan for us.
To what, we can't say assuredly. We ain't God.

Or however, there are tons... but one that can be noteably placed down is:
We are God.

Not neccessarily that we ARE God.

However... by taking several religions out of context, getting every single "TRUTH" into a general matter... they seem to connect. So... it ends up, that because GOD IS EVERYTHING, we are that everything. And that creation of everything and the existance of nothing is God Himself. That everything beyond comprehension and within grasp is God. That God is Love.


Then there is:
God is Love. And how can love be expressed when there is nothing to love?
So... our creation.



.... but I'm just listing.. let's get back on topic. -_-

__________________

animemeanime

no he was wrong.

__________________
"Brodie: "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for Sega"
Silent Bob: "Excitement, adventure... A Jedi craves not these things. "
MALLRATS

Soshi Kitai

I must say, animex2. That was very direct. XD

^_^ And VERY on topic! *congratulations*

<_< As for my opinion for darwin? : IT CAN explain... but does it? ... I leave my opinion open for that. ^_^ And that's my answer.

__________________

preston drake

this post is great! the theory of evolution is an explination....but does it explain our existance?

Gaius Nemu

I believe that Darwin was on crack. Somehow his theory took hold when some other people did the work for him. I don't think the "evidence" that was found later was interpreted right though.

Your statement also has nothing to do with Darwin. Your statement just basically says that things adapt, and I believe that is totally possible.

My experience in medicine and life brings me to two theories hold over all others. The second law of thermodynamics and Ackham's Razor. Darwin's theory of evolution goes against both of these...

__________________

Twitchy

Thing is you believe in what you want I will believe in what I want

__________________

thanks shonen