Thread: sex education

Geez its been so long since I took that class...what like 5th-6th grade? Like ten years ago now. Anyways I agree the class was completely forgetable. Did little but tell me what I already knew at the time. I can see why its still done, to inforce precautionary senses in teens but still, they need to be more realistic about it instead of teaching it like its an anatomy class.

Originally Posted by N.Y._Soulja

Originally Posted by Arrianna

You mean babies?

There's a reason the condoms are next to the diapers in most retail stores.

very ture but not all kids now about VD's. That is why there should be sex ed.

True, but Health class can teach about VD etc without going into the soft-porn. It's not like it's all that hard to figure out what goes where, but learning about VD and everything that goes with being sexually active, such as higher chances of cancer for girls under the age of 18-21 or the failure rate of condoms etc, seems to be seriously missing.

Originally Posted by Arrianna

True, but Health class can teach about VD etc without going into the soft-porn. It's not like it's all that hard to figure out what goes where, but learning about VD and everything that goes with being sexually active, such as higher chances of cancer for girls under the age of 18-21 or the failure rate of condoms etc, seems to be seriously missing.

What's VD???

Originally Posted by pyoro-pyoro

What's VD???

Venerial Disease - just another std

bout the subject i have never taken a sex ed class
but if they do teach them about abstinence they should
also accept its gonna happen, so might as well make sure
its done right.
u cant stop teens from wanting to have sex - thats all
most of them think about (especially guys) hell i would
think about it at least every few minutes.



Damn, i hope my baby girl never grows up

Originally Posted by Arrianna

True, but Health class can teach about VD etc without going into the soft-porn. It's not like it's all that hard to figure out what goes where, but learning about VD and everything that goes with being sexually active, such as higher chances of cancer for girls under the age of 18-21 or the failure rate of condoms etc, seems to be seriously missing.

VEry true indeed, I won't argue there....................... but I will say this, I think Sex ed is great, it can really help show wat sex is, and waht are the outcomes of it

Originally Posted by N.Y._Soulja

I think Sex ed is great, it can really help show wat sex is, and waht are the outcomes of it

But they don't need sex-ed to know what sex is. And the outcomes are obvious, we just choose to ignore them.

I think why some of us thinks that sex ed doesn't work is because it is taught in middle school, but the way they're teaching it, it would seem like the students are in their 20-30s, married and want to have kids but don't know how to.

When it finally gets to health ed it's high school, and probably by then many kids had sex already.