Thread: Square-enix

I guess 12 is the next one right? I have never played mana so I can't really comment, but what's really annoying about FFCC is the fact you're bound to a stupid circle. and then if you wanna move, someone has to pick it up. That annoys the crap outta me, plus I had hoped the characters would've looked a little cooler than what they did.

Well, Ryke, maybe there is no 'hey-day' for Enix, but hel, their SNES RPGs are 70 times better than the majority of RPGs on current systems.

It's hard to beat classics. Especially in rpgs.

I still think that even a bad square game is 99.9% than most average rpgs that are released by other companies.

But i must admit KAOI do make some great games like disgaea hour of darkness.

FFXII should be a intresting game but again its differenct as its not tradition turn based its real time, i dont like that i want my turn based FF games.Jan

I still think that even a bad square game is 99.9% than most average rpgs that are released by other companies.

Oh? So I guess that means that games like Xenosaga, Skies of Arcadia, and the Shin Megami Tensei series are bad games? :Thumbd:

Skies of Arcadia is awesome! battle in air, with your party, I like that game. Vise is pretty sweet.

Originally Posted by GamesTesterJan

I still think that even a bad square game is 99.9% than most average rpgs that are released by other companies.

But i must admit KAOI do make some great games like disgaea hour of darkness.

FFXII should be a intresting game but again its differenct as its not tradition turn based its real time, i dont like that i want my turn based FF games.Jan

Whoa whoa whoa, slow down there. You make it sound Squaresoft is the only company distributing successful RPG games. What about Xenosaga, Shadow Hearts, Atelier Eternal Mana, and many others by other companies ;/ !?