Allright here I go try to keep up. When you count to one hundred do you count like this? 1 2 3 4 5 or do you count like this 0.000001 0.000002 0.000003 you see when you count in the former method you group perfectly good and valuable numbers together so that you can count easier. The same can be said with your social classification dilema. There are how many millions of people out there in the world how many of them will you fully understand probably not many in comparison but life is short if you counted to one hundred in millionths it would take a long time the same can be said for understanding people we are all unique you arrent afforded enough time in this life. Now the human nature is a curious one, we want to understand our surroundings, we want to count. We want to understand the people around us but like I said there just isn't enough time so you understand the "people" not the "person" and as long as you understand that there is something different about each of the people in the group then you can see the value of each "millionth". By grouping the people around us we make our surroundings easier to grasp so that we can move past counting and onto what we each feel to be important. Don't get me wrong sterotyping people isn't the nicest thing to do and no one likes it to be done to them but I find it to be a neccesary evil. Just remember there is a difference between seeing people as a group and judging them as a group. This world has but one judge and it's not you or me.