Thread: Are women better leaders

Originally Posted by Abu Dhabi

It's not that we're complaining about PMS, it's that women use it as an excuse to be bitchy to men, when they can control it.

you can't just be leaders of the world when you just make men your slaves, not all men are porn-addicted jerk-offs, just the ones you know.

how do you expect them to treat you as an equal when all you want is for them to bow down to your superiority. that is what you want, otherwise you woulnd't spend your time bitcing but actually doing something about the problem.

don't complain about penises, without it your butt wouldn't be born.

women are superior than men. men base their ideology on adam and eve, and the fact that "god" is a man. it has nothing to do with bitching. oh and don't worry, women are doing something to change their position. and men do the exact same thing. they make women think of them as superior. so i think they should get their just reward. women leaders are possible, but everyone expects you to still have kids. george bush didn't have to raise his daughters. his wife did it while he was setting up his "military" career. women make men. and men leave them behind in the shadows.

Maureen Murphy's thoughts on why there aren't more female politicians:
"The reason there are so few female politicians is that it is too much trouble to put makeup on two faces."

Something I noticed in the opening post:

Meanwhile, other women are flourishing as leaders in nontraditional roles. Entrepreneur Donna Dubinsky cofounded Palm, the hand-held computing giant, then left and cofounded its highly successful rival, Handspring.

Does anybody else see this as a bit manipulative/back-stabbing? She co-founded one company just to go and co-find their "highly successful rival"? Hmmmm....
Not only that, but was the other co-founder a male, by any chance?

Thats the primary problem with the worl everyone thinks there better everyone thinks a group is better that they belong to When people stop thinking in tearms of whos better and just try to inprove them selves instead of kicking otheres thats when true equality will start emerge

ALL humans have faults. I would have to say they would be just as good and just as bad.

Originally Posted by Arrianna

Given the choice between the second and a man who is supplying for himself and his family even if he was less compitent, I would take the man. Why? Because when women become selfcentered they do it better then men as well. There is a reason it is said that "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned".

Thank you Arianna!!!

... Men make women!!!

men and women are equal, one cannot be without the other. a man shouldn't get a job cuz he's a man, and neither should a woman get a job just becuz se's a woman.

neither of us is going to give in, and i'm okay with that. just know, that with your mind set you'll never get any farther in this world becuz you refuse to see people as equal. people is just people...

God is not a man, nor a woman, nor contained in any being. He is Him, or rather, It is It. It is not God's descion to make women lower than men, that is man's own interpretation becuz of PEOPLE'S desire to have power over things. That's the same, no matter what the gender. Some men want power, so they rule over their wives; women want power, and scared to go against her husband, so she rules over the children. It's a cycle, becuz people refuse to see each other as people...

both women and men...

... Men make women!!!

men and women are equal, one cannot be without the other. a man shouldn't get a job cuz he's a man, and neither should a woman get a job just becuz se's a woman.

neither of us is going to give in, and i'm okay with that. just know, that with your mind set you'll never get any farther in this world becuz you refuse to see people as equal. people is just people...

God is not a man, nor a woman, nor contained in any being. He is Him, or rather, It is It. It is not God's descion to make women lower than men, that is man's own interpretation becuz of PEOPLE'S desire to have power over things. That's the same, no matter what the gender. Some men want power, so they rule over their wives; women want power, and scared to go against her husband, so she rules over the children. It's a cycle, becuz people refuse to see each other as people...

both women and men...

women make men. in all aspects. a husband wouldn't be a father unless his wife took care and raised his children. sure they are her children, but why should her husband go out and have a career, while she raises kids and sits at home? due to women's role as a mother, men can have jobs, go out drinking and go to bars and have high paying jobs. the woman allows the man to have soem freedom because she takes away teh burden of the man raising the children. even if we consider biology, the X chromosome has over 2,300 genes while the Y chromosome has only 2 dozen genes. it is rather useless and only used to give the Y to the fetus, which produces a male...
and besides, not trusting a woman to be a leader because she will not be able to control her bitchiness is a stereotype. not all women look for an excuse to start a fight and be a bitch/PMS. a leader has ot have courage, pride, honor and brains. any woman has balls to take on the job of being a leader. the common stereotypes have to vanish for that to happen though.

Originally Posted by FallenAngel

women make men. in all aspects. a husband wouldn't be a father unless his wife took care and raised his children. sure they are her children, but why should her husband go out and have a career, while she raises kids and sits at home? due to women's role as a mother, men can have jobs, go out drinking and go to bars and have high paying jobs. the woman allows the man to have soem freedom because she takes away teh burden of the man raising the children. even if we consider biology, the X chromosome has over 2,300 genes while the Y chromosome has only 2 dozen genes. it is rather useless and only used to give the Y to the fetus, which produces a male...
and besides, not trusting a woman to be a leader because she will not be able to control her bitchiness is a stereotype. not all women look for an excuse to start a fight and be a bitch/PMS. a leader has ot have courage, pride, honor and brains. any woman has balls to take on the job of being a leader. the common stereotypes have to vanish for that to happen though.

I like how not only are you arguing against the stereotypes given to women by sexist males, but you're helping the stereotypes live on as well. "The common stereotypes have to vanish" yet you said yourself that a husband gets to go out and have a career while his wife stays at home raising the kids. "Due to women's role as a mother...."
Sounds like you're fighting against yourself, chief. I've got a special word for you people.