Well, I tend to go for information with the least amount of bias possible.
I looked up a few presidents in each and I think it's extremely obvious that Conservapedia is heavily biased (thus the name). For example, the Barack Obama article starts:
Compared to Wikipedia:Barack Hussein Obama II (birth name Barry Soetoro, allegedly born in Honolulu August 4, 1961) is the 44th President of the United States, and the first President who is biracial. He previously was associated with several radical causes and served less than four years as a first-term Democratic Senator from Illinois (2005-2008).
I can honestly say that, even though I'm pretty liberal, I'd much rather have raw information rather than statements taken out of context, biased studies, etc. Liberapedia, for example, is a horrible resource. Even though I agree with a lot of liberal viewpoints, it's pretty safe to say that it's even more biased than Conservapedia.Barack Hussein Obama II (Listeni /bəˈrɑːk huːˈseɪn oʊˈbɑːmə/; born August 4, 1961) is the 44th and current President of the United States. He is the first African American to hold the office. Obama previously served as a United States Senator from Illinois, from January 2005 until he resigned after his election to the presidency in November 2008.
I'm sticking with Wikipedia.Barack Obama is the current President of the United States. He was the junior United States Senator from Illinois from 2005 until 2008. He is working to end the war in Iraq, and despite Republican attempts to ruin it he passed Universal Health Care Reform which has started to go into effect.
He is a man who knows what it's like to overcome racism and rise up to become the president of the United States. He is a man who has united the entire Democratic party, and who aims to unite the nation. Some liberals have expressed concerns that his legislative accomplishments thus far are lacking. Well, maybe send him a better Congress to work with, geniuses.
He has been frequently opposed by born-again pro-family politicians who are horrified that his welfare policies may actually improve living conditions for low-income families.