
Originally Posted by
anime_being_god
Yes.
Based on the evidence shown so far in this debate, it would seem so that both naturalism and theism have say to what the mind does through or without will.
But how about looking at it this way, if one naturalism or theism, had to be more credible than the other, which would it be, and why?
I would say theism would be more credible for the fact that naturalism may only make your body adapt in some cases rather than theism which gives the ability to choose freely of ones actions, rather than through experince.
Bookmarks