Which had evidently given refuge to hundreds of people according to the UN. I watched an interview with the UN representative about the bombing and he fumed about all the people that could have been injured. However when asked point blank whether or not it was true Hamas had used places like that before to fire from all he did was scream about how outrageous it was they fired on a UN compound; or in other words they don't care if Hamas uses their compounds and installations to fire upon their enemies but anyone who dares to fire back on UN property is the one in the wrong.
It's called seeing the forest instead of the trees. It's my way of taking religion/Zionism out of the equation. Because people are not unbiased when discussing Israel I like to take a look at their enemies through others eyes in order to get a less radical view of what they are like. The point is that Hamas does not bear up well under any looking glass no matter which one it is.
Oh I don't know. It looks like they have managed to get most of their leaders. Some would say that is pretty successful.
On the contrary any country should meddle in the affairs of any other country that will impact their countries security or economic interest. National security is far more important then people gives it credit for. My problem with the UN is that it has been taken over from the inside by the very types of people it was created to protect the world from. The UN now is nothing more then a dictators club to move forward their political agenda against less powerful countries and they look away as others use their organization for their own purposes as long as it doesn't hurt them personally. Rampant corruption and constant grafting keeps me from being surprised by Hamas and Islamic Jihad planting teachers there, they probably have the best schools.
Possibly. They have also said they would like to be finished well before Obama's inauguration if Hamas can behave itself. Interesting yes?
I found the article very interesting. The point of it was exactly who those individuals were. No more or less then the ones responsible for setting policy and for leading others in the region. Sure it's no big deal if "Joe" down the street supports NAZI propaganda but if it is a state governor, federal cabinet member, or even the president himself?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks










You should be proud to take a stand against Zionist imperialism. 




Bookmarks