Ah, sorry about that, I guess I'm getting ahead of myself. While I'm Atheist, I can say that I can see the possibility of a God existing. One of my stances has been that if a God exists, it is drastically different from our interpretations of it found in religion. I think a God would still have to make sense, and thusly, no omnipotent power. What are your thoughts on this matter?One at a time, please. That's quite a lot, for an answer to a single question.
Which would you like us to discuss first: omnipotence, or proof of God's existence + Russell's Teapot?. Though I'm warning you, discussing omnipotence would be pointless if we don't see first if it's possible that God exists. Comprende?