*sigh* ok a third approach
ill try to demonstrate common sense.
a scientist is using the scientific method to examine a frog
on day one he puts the frog on the table and claps his hands. the frog jumps
next day he cuts off the frogs arms. claps his hands. the frog jumps.
next day he cuts off the other arm. claps his hands. the frog jumps agian.
next day he cuts off the frogs leg. claps his hands. the frog jumps agian.
next day he cuts off the other leg. claps his hand. but amazingly the frog would not jump. he concludes that the frog couldnt jump because by cutting off limbs makes the frog deaf.
this is true. we cannot prove it wrong. however, we all know better.
to apply this to the tree situation.
for the senario to occur:
the tree must fall
what we are observing for:
does the tree make a noise?(assuming no one is around to hear it)
if we observe a tree falling(to the ground, non vacuum enviroment), we would notice that it makes alot of noise as its falling. if tested an infinite number of times we will always get the same result.
if a tree falls(to the ground, non vacuum enviroment). we assume that the tree didnt make a noise because.
the tree never fell at all.
so if the tree never fell in the first place>conflict with our senario"the tree must fall"


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote





Bookmarks