Thread: Who For President

Originally Posted by trustworthy

I don’t know if this is the right place for this or not, though it seams to be. So if it isn’t, I am sorry, mod’s just move it please to the right place.

Anyways, here it is, who are you supporting for president, why, if you are unsure, ask questions and people try to answer them. We can talk about all of the candidates views, and plans, and everything, but there will be no bashing or rudeness. If you don’t like a candidate, say why, but do not demean them; or anyone who supports them. This is an open debate and discussion, questions, answers, and statements are all allowed.

I honestly don't care who wins. Clinton . . . Obama . . . a third-party candidate . . . So long as they can take care of the United States, maintain and strive for better connections with other countries, and do what is right/just . . . that's all that matters.

Grumble Grumble Grumble

Originally Posted by divine_punishment

I honestly don't care who wins. Clinton . . . Obama . . . a third-party candidate . . . So long as they can take care of the United States, maintain and strive for better connections with other countries, and do what is right/just . . . that's all that matters.

But you see, that's the whole point. If Al Gore had won that election, do you think we would have an army of occupation in the Middle East right now?!?!

Who ever wins the next Presidential Election is going to have to make some important decisions for foreign policy for that region. You might want to take some time and find out what the candidates are saying what they want to do, and reconsider your statement...

i'm all for hilary, not just 'cause i'm a female, i think obama a nice guy and all, but i dont think he can stand up to the senate and congress.

Originally Posted by LenMiyata

Grumble Grumble Grumble

But you see, that's the whole point. If Al Gore had won that election, do you think we would have an army of occupation in the Middle East right now?!?!

"Would 9/11 even have happened" should also be added to that question. Inquiries into the attack showed that the CIA and the Bush Administration had the intelligence, but either did nothing, or were too slow to act.

hmm... let see who for president. i would say arnold schwarzenegger as us president even if it for just one term shot of cheif of state. i think he can be good as that he can settle thing in a calm way or get serious and get out his shotgun and shoot people (just kidding) ah i vote for him if he go for president

Originally Posted by aceman67

"Would 9/11 even have happened" should also be added to that question. Inquiries into the attack showed that the CIA and the Bush Administration had the intelligence, but either did nothing, or were too slow to act.

Hell, the CLINTON administration had knowledge to the attack, months before Bush fired them for his new Admin. I read it in Time a couple/few years back.
It's not a matter of being too slow. They did absolutely nothing. They knew what was goin' down. You seen "Farenheit 9/11"? (pardon my spelling) Did you see the look on Bush's face when they delivered the news? He didn't care about what happened. He couldn't give a rat's $^&*!! He wanted an excuse to go to the middle east and stir s*** up! And he got it. You notice how he went after the wrong guy? Yeah... Too slow my @$$.