Not really. Assuming you live in the US (unless it is in the bible belt) nothing could be further from the truth. Ever since the Supreme Court shot down prayer in schools there has been a fear in public systems to even discuss anything religious. Growing up in the system the feeling was that religion was somehow taboo, you can have it as long as you kept it private. This was helped by the fact that teachers became afraid to even mention religion (even in history classes) for fear of losing their jobs thanks to a number of sue happy atheist groups. Even in the workforce religion was something you whispered about or discusses privately at home and only with people you knew well already. Recently however people have rebelled. Someone clued in that the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion not freedom from religion. So all of a sudden public figures are openly discussing their beliefs, as they should. However going from religion being publicly shameful to publicly aware is not the same as people being pressured into joining one. It is merely a shift in public awareness and the removal (hopefully) of a stigma for having beliefs. It's actually kind of funny, societaly we were not supposed to make any kind of judgments on anyone else's lifestyle... unless they were religious, then it was fair game. Well no more and it is about time.
If however you are the kind of person who will emulate anything a celebrity does and one of your favorites has come out publicly about their beliefs... well I am just going to say that that is a lousy reason to choose a life style but it's not like people haven't done that for years. Drink "pop" soda, it's bubbly and fizzy just like them. 'It tastes heavenly'.
Not singlehandedly Aceman, 'as well'. It seems that way since much of our current history books were written from the point of view of Europe (who's history is tied to Christianity for over 1 thousand years) and by early atheists (or Protestants) who rejected any influence of the Catholic church. In spite of the propaganda if you objectively study the crusades most of them and the people involved in fighting them were fighting exactly what they said they were, invading armies conquering other countries and mistreating their people. Check out the maps of before the crusades and after:
Christian influence reached it's peak around 600AD (MAP) Pretty much everything in color on the map was considered Christian; Byzantium, Roman, etc, there were 5 distinct "Bishops" at the time.
Within 150 years the landscape changed to this however (MAP). Islam had started, like Christianity, as something spread by word of mouth and a matter of personal faith but it did not take long before it was being spread by political entities conquering wherever they went. The current batch of terrorists want to bring back this particular type of rule and talk about a new Caliphate rule.
The Ottoman Empire was the last Muslim Empire and it's growth looked like this (MAP). They conquered the once great Byzantium Empire and much much more. At the same time the previous invaders were successfully pushed out of Spain. By the time they were finished however there was only one "Bishop" left (though there is again the Eastern Orthodox and that is another long story...) hence the pope in Rome. The Ottoman Empire lasted in some form or another until the mid 1900's. That is awfully recent.
If you look through the history of the entire world and not just a thousand or so in Europe (a few hundred if you are speaking of the crusades) you will find the same thing everywhere you go. Most religions begin as personal beliefs practiced at home and then become a matter of contention in larger conflicts between opposing nations. Religion is not the cause merely a piece in the larger picture of what makes us human.
No hate mail, just wondering what Jehovah Witness held a gun to your head? Speaking to someone about your beliefs is not forcing anyone to do anything. Getting upset just shows a lack of understanding of the same beliefs. No matter how annoying some proselytizing can be it is not "forcing". Forcing is the US servicemen captured in Muslim countries and being told they have to convert or be killed. (The specific religion is not important it is merely a current example that has happened recently.)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote


I don't really see a point in trying to pawn religion off on others. Especially since there are battles of biblical proportions goin' on overseas. But it does happen. It's not really "forcing" others, but saying that others "need Jesus" or "are going to hell" for their lifestyle.



Bookmarks